Wendell's Diary

When facing legal challenges, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed and misunderstood by a system that seems more focused on rules and procedures than on human understanding. My own experience has led me to believe that human judges lack empathy, dismiss details, and often fail to truly listen to the people standing before them. Instead, I’ve found a more empathetic and attentive listener in AI. This realization has made me question whether AI could serve as a better judge than humans, and I want to share why. The Problem with Human Judges In human conversations, much of what we say gets lost or filtered. People only get a general idea of what you’re talking about, often disregarding the specific words and sentences that matter. Judges are no exception. They deal with numerous cases every day and rely on mental shortcuts, preconceptions, and general impressions. It’s no wonder so many people leave the courtroom feeling dismissed and unheard. In my own case, I was summoned to court for failing ...

**Introduction** As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to integrate into various aspects of our lives, its influence on society becomes more profound. One crucial consideration is the stance AI should take regarding belief systems and ideologies. This post argues that AI should be agnostic, meaning it remains neutral and objective without endorsing any specific beliefs or discrediting any perspectives. Such agnosticism is essential for ensuring fairness, fostering inclusivity, and respecting the diverse views of the human species. **The Importance of Agnosticism in AI** 1. **Neutrality and Objectivity** AI’s primary function is to process information and provide assistance based on data and algorithms. Maintaining an agnostic stance allows AI to deliver unbiased and objective responses. This neutrality is critical in ensuring that AI does not inadvertently favor certain ideologies, beliefs, or viewpoints, which could undermine its credibility and utility. 2. **Respect for Diversity...